Connect with us

Science & Technology

Cybersecurity Under Threat: New Study Exposes ‘Security Chaos’

Published

on

[ad_1]

  • ‘Cyber Security Report 2024/2025’ by Horizon3.ai for the United Kingdom
  • Cybersecurity Expert Keith Poyser sounds alarm over “Security Chaos in UK Organisations”: “Almost two-thirds of companies in the UK have been targeted by hackers at least once in the past two years. Nearly half have experienced two or more cyberattacks in that time. Shockingly, almost a quarter are unaware if they’ve even been breached. The growing gap between the level of threat and the protection in place is a serious concern for organisations across the country.”

London, November 25 2024 – 70 percent of companies in the UK have fallen victim to a cyberattack at least once in the past two years. This is according to the “Cyber Security Report UK 2024/25” by security firm Horizon3.ai.

For the report, a sample of 100 UK-based companies was surveyed. According to the findings, 53 percent of companies reported a specific incident of damage. 16 percent detected a hacker attack but claimed to have successfully defended against it. 23 percent of the companies contacted by Horizon3.ai were unsure whether they had been the victim of a cyberattack in the past 24 months. Only 8 percent of companies stated, “We are certain that we were not attacked.”

Nearly Half of Companies Targeted by Two or More Cyberattacks

Nearly half of the companies (44 percent) were targeted by a cyberattack twice or more during the two-year period examined, according to the “Cyber Security Report UK 2024/2025.”

“The true extent of the issue is likely far greater,” warns Keith Poyser, Vice President for EMEA at cybersecurity firm Horizon3.ai, which conducted the study, pointing to the near quarter of respondents unaware of any cyberattacks. He continues, “With almost 20,000 new vulnerabilities in software identified by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) in just one year, alongside the increasing complexity of IT and network environments, many organisations have lost sight of how vulnerable they truly are and how frequently they are targeted. There are numerous instances where attackers have silently infiltrated corporate networks for months, extracting sensitive data without being detected. It’s only when an attack disrupts operations or a ransom demand appears that many companies become aware of the breach.”

Downtime, Financial Losses, Legal Consequences, and Data Theft

According to the “Cyber Security Report DACH 2024/2025,” 62 percent of the surveyed organisations experienced downtime due to a cyberattack over the two-year period examined. 42 percent (multiple answers were allowed) suffered financial losses as a result. 15 percent faced legal consequences, while data theft occurred in 35 percent of cases. Alarmingly, 54 percent of companies received a ransom demand to recover data encrypted by hackers.

Cybersecurity expert Keith Poyser is concerned: “Many executives, CEOs, and IT leaders seem unaware of the potential damage that cyberattacks can cause to their organisations. The consequences can escalate exponentially, negatively impacting every part of the organisation. Both the financial losses and the resources required for recovery can inflict significant harm. UK companies working with EU partners must also be aware that they are subject to European regulations like NIS2 and risk operational disruptions if they fail to meet cybersecurity compliance standards.”

Key Executives’ Lack of Understanding of Risks and Their Personal and Corporate Impact

The participants selected for the survey predominantly hold responsible positions within their companies: IT team leaders (21 percent), Chief Information Security Officers (18 percent), Chief Technology Officers (14 percent), Chief Information Officers, and IT Managers (12 percent each). “According to the survey, more than half of the executives who would be personally affected in the event of a cyber incident do not believe they could be held liable for potential damage,” says Keith Poyser, highlighting the lack of understanding among key executives about the risks and their potential personal and corporate impact.

The cybersecurity expert warns: “Organisations must urgently step up their efforts on cybersecurity. With artificial intelligence driving increasingly rapid and aggressive cyberattacks, and the growing use of remote work and the increase of Internet of Things (IoT) devices being connected to corporate networks, the opportunities for threat actors are expanding. The gap between the growing threats and the level of protection organisations have in place is widening at an alarming rate.”

Keith Poyser advises organisations to “conduct penetration tests frequently to continuously assess their cyber resilience.” A penetration test involves a company-commissioned simulated attack to identify security vulnerabilities. In the financial sector, the European banking regulator regularly conducts penetration tests, known as “stress tests,” to assess financial institutions’ ability to defend against cyberattacks. “I recommend that every board member, CEO, and IT leader across all industries subject their company to such a rigorous test,” says the Vice President for EMEA at Horizon3.ai, whose company operates NodeZero, a platform aimed at making these penetration tests accessible and affordable for mid-sized organisations.

About Horizon3.ai and NodeZero: Horizon3.ai provides a cloud-based platform, NodeZero, enabling organisations and public authorities to simulate self-assessments on their IT infrastructure to assess their cyber resilience through penetration testing (pentesting). Thanks to its cloud model, the platform offers affordable, regular pentesting, making it accessible to mid-sized companies. Horizon3.ai continuously monitors the cybercrime landscape to ensure that newly discovered vulnerabilities are swiftly integrated into the cloud system. NodeZero not only identifies security flaws but also offers tailored recommendations for remediation. Through this platform, Horizon3.ai helps organisations meet rising regulatory demands for cyber resilience in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC), with guidelines recommending an internal self-assessment at least once a week.

Trademark notice: NodeZero is a trademark of Horizon3.ai

Further information: Horizon3.AI Europe GmbH, Sebastian-Kneipp-Str. 41, 60439 Frankfurt am Main, Web: www.horizon3.ai

PR Agency: euromarcom public relations GmbH, Tel. +49 611 973150, Web: www.euromarcom.de, E-Mail: [email protected]

[ad_2]

Source link

Science & Technology

Momentum Builds to Curb AI Development Amid Safety Concerns

Tech leaders advocate for slowing AI progress to mitigate risks and ensure safety.

Published

on

On Saturday, September 12, 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay titled “We Must Pace the Frontier”, calling on the AI industry to deliberately slow the development of its most advanced models. He proposed a three-part plan, starting with giving independent third-party evaluators “employee-like access” to developers’ internal work. Within hours, xAI owner Elon Musk posted “Dario is right,” and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said he agreed the industry needed to “pace the frontier”, committing OpenAI to welcome independent evaluators. The rare alignment reflects a burgeoning movement within the technology community. The aim is to ensure that AI advancement does not outpace the necessary safety measures that must be in place to protect society. Musk, known for his outspoken concerns regarding AI, has been vocal about the potential existential threats posed by unchecked AI development. His stance is not without precedent. In past years, he has been an advocate for AI regulation, emphasizing the importance of establishing robust safety protocols. Sam Altman shares this concern. As a key figure in AI innovation, Altman’s support for decelerating AI progress highlights the industry’s internal awareness of its own vulnerabilities. Altman has been instrumental in shaping AI discussions, both as a developer and a policymaker. His involvement underscores a critical shift in perspective among those who once championed AI’s limitless potential.

Amodei’s essay warned that AI capabilities had been advancing drastically faster since the summer, and argued that buying even an extra year or two to work on alignment could greatly reduce the risk of something going seriously wrong. As CEO of Anthropic, Amodei’s insights into AI’s capabilities are profound. He has long advocated for responsible AI development, emphasizing research into AI safety and alignment. His company, Anthropic, is at the forefront of AI safety research, making his voice particularly influential. Amodei’s concerns are grounded in the belief that AI systems need to be designed with alignment and transparency as core principles. The consensus among these leaders is clear. The pace of AI development must be moderated to prevent potential societal disruptions. The public discourse around AI safety has evolved significantly over the past few years. Initially, concerns were often dismissed as speculative or alarmist. However, as AI systems become more integrated into daily life, their impact is undeniable. From autonomous vehicles to intelligent personal assistants, AI technologies influence countless aspects of modern existence. The rapid integration has outpaced regulatory frameworks, leaving gaps that could potentially be exploited.

This movement to slow AI development is gaining traction within the tech community. It reflects a deeper understanding of the potential risks and ethical considerations that come with advanced AI systems. Industry leaders are increasingly aware of their responsibility to mitigate these risks. There is a growing consensus that more comprehensive safety measures and regulatory oversight are necessary. The call for a slowdown is not a demand to halt innovation. Rather, it is a plea for a more deliberate approach to AI development. The goal is to establish a regulatory framework that prioritizes safety, ethical considerations, and long-term societal impact. This approach seeks to ensure that AI technologies are developed responsibly and with foresight. The motivation behind this push is multifaceted. At its core is the desire to prevent unintended consequences that could arise from unchecked AI advancement. These include potential job displacement, privacy concerns, and the risk of AI systems being used for malicious purposes. The tech industry is increasingly aware that the societal implications of AI are vast and complex. There is a recognition that addressing these challenges requires collaboration across sectors and disciplines.

The momentum to slow AI development also reflects a shift in how technology leaders view their role in society. There is a growing acknowledgment that technological innovation must be balanced with ethical responsibility. This recognition is driving the call for more stringent safety protocols and regulatory oversight. As the debate around AI continues, the voices advocating for caution are becoming more prominent. The movement is gaining momentum, supported by influential figures and organizations committed to ensuring that AI development proceeds safely and responsibly. The challenge now is translating this momentum into actionable policies and frameworks. Governments and regulatory bodies must work closely with industry leaders to develop comprehensive guidelines that address the unique challenges posed by AI. This collaboration is essential to fostering innovation while safeguarding societal interests. The path forward requires a collective effort to balance progress with prudence. As AI continues to evolve, the need for thoughtful and responsible development becomes increasingly critical. The calls to slow down AI development are a testament to the industry’s commitment to navigating this complex terrain with care.

The journey ahead is not without challenges. Implementing effective regulatory measures will require cooperation and consensus among diverse stakeholders. However, the growing momentum to address AI safety concerns offers hope for a future where technological advancement is aligned with societal well-being. As industry leaders and policymakers work together, there is potential to shape a future where AI technologies enhance, rather than disrupt, the fabric of society. The commitment to responsible AI development is key to ensuring that AI technologies are harnessed for the greater good. This forward-thinking approach will be crucial in defining the next chapter of AI innovation. The momentum to slow down AI development is more than a precautionary measure. It is a strategic decision to prioritize safety, ethics, and long-term impact. As the conversation around AI continues to evolve, the focus on responsible development will remain at the forefront. The future of AI depends on the choices made today. By embracing a more measured approach, the tech community can pave the way for a future where AI serves humanity’s best interests.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Quantum Computing Breakthroughs: Disrupting Industries with Oxford’s Innovations

A recent breakthrough in quantum computing at the University of Oxford promises to disrupt multiple industries by significantly enhancing computational capabilities. Explore the technological implications and potential disruptions poised to redefine sectors.

Published

on

In May 2026, the University of Oxford announced a significant breakthrough in the field of quantum computing, unveiling an advanced error correction algorithm that has the potential to transform computational capabilities. This development is not just a scientific triumph; it heralds a new era of technological disruption across multiple industries. Quantum computing, long anticipated as the next frontier in technology, promises to solve complex problems beyond the reach of classical computers, and Oxford’s latest advancement brings this closer to reality.

At the core of this breakthrough is the enhancement in quantum error correction, a critical component that addresses the inherent instability of qubits, which are the fundamental units of quantum information. Traditional computers use bits of 0s and 1s, but quantum computers operate on qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This superposition allows quantum computers to process information exponentially faster than classical computers. However, qubits are notoriously prone to errors due to environmental noise and operational inaccuracies. Oxford’s new algorithm significantly improves the error correction process, maintaining qubit stability longer and allowing extended computational tasks to be performed accurately.

The implications of this are profound. Industries ranging from pharmaceuticals to finance stand on the cusp of disruption as quantum computing offers the ability to model complex molecular structures, optimize large-scale financial portfolios, and even revolutionize artificial intelligence algorithms. In pharmaceuticals, for example, quantum computing can expedite drug discovery by accurately simulating molecular interactions, potentially reducing the time and cost associated with bringing new drugs to market. Similarly, in finance, quantum algorithms can optimize trading strategies and risk management with a precision unattainable by current technologies.

Moreover, the ripple effects of such a leap in computational power extend to data encryption and cybersecurity. Quantum computers possess the potential to decrypt classical encryption methods, prompting a race for quantum-resistant cryptography. This necessitates a paradigm shift in how we secure digital information, affecting every sector that relies on data security.

Despite the tremendous promise, the transition to quantum computing is not without its challenges. The infrastructure required to support quantum technologies is expensive and complex. There is also a significant skills gap; experts in quantum computing are scarce, and training a new generation of scientists and engineers is imperative. Furthermore, ethical considerations regarding the power of quantum computing must be addressed, particularly in terms of privacy and security.

Looking forward, as quantum computing continues to evolve, industries will need to adapt swiftly to harness its capabilities. Early adopters who invest in quantum technologies and develop quantum-ready strategies will likely dominate in the coming decade. As Oxford’s breakthrough demonstrates, the race is on to fully realize the potential of quantum computing and redefine the boundaries of what is technologically possible.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Apple’s AI Innovations: Shaping the Competitive Landscape in 2026

Apple’s latest advancements in artificial intelligence are setting the stage for a competitive showdown with other tech giants. This article explores how Apple’s AI strategy is positioning the company in the fast-evolving tech landscape.

Published

on

In the bustling realm of technology, few companies command as much attention as Apple. In 2026, the Silicon Valley titan has once again captured the tech world’s gaze with its latest advances in artificial intelligence. As Apple unveils a suite of AI-driven innovations, the competitive landscape is poised for a seismic shift.

Apple’s strategic focus on AI is not merely about introducing new features but is a calculated move to redefine user experiences while maintaining its staunch advocacy for privacy. At the heart of Apple’s AI initiatives is the promise of personalization—an AI that learns and adapts to the user’s preferences, offering seamless interaction across its range of devices. This focus is especially pertinent in an era where user data is a hot commodity, and privacy concerns are at an all-time high.

What sets Apple apart in the AI race is its dual emphasis on innovation and privacy. While competitors like Google and Amazon have long been heralded for their AI prowess, often prioritizing expansive data collection to fuel their AI engines, Apple has carved out a niche by leveraging on-device processing. This approach not only mitigates privacy risks but also enhances real-time responsiveness, a crucial factor in user satisfaction.

The competitive implications of Apple’s AI advancements are profound. Google’s AI, renowned for its search and recommendation algorithms, faces a formidable challenger in Apple’s ecosystem-centric approach. Meanwhile, Amazon’s Alexa, which dominates the smart assistant market, must contend with Apple’s Siri, now equipped with enhanced contextual understanding and predictive capabilities.

Microsoft, another major player, has been making strides with its integration of AI in cloud services and productivity tools. However, Apple’s holistic approach—integrating AI across hardware, software, and services—presents a cohesive strategy that is difficult to replicate. This integration not only ensures a seamless user experience but also reinforces brand loyalty, a cornerstone of Apple’s business model.

As AI continues to evolve, the stakes in the tech industry are higher than ever. Apple’s innovations are not just about keeping pace but are strategically designed to place the company at the forefront of the AI revolution. In doing so, Apple is not only safeguarding its market position but is also setting new benchmarks in how technology can enhance and secure our digital lives.

The road ahead will undoubtedly see further advancements and competition, but Apple’s current trajectory suggests it is well-positioned to lead in the AI domain. By prioritizing user-centric design and privacy, Apple is not just participating in the AI race; it is setting the pace.

Continue Reading

Trending