Connect with us

Business & Finance

Study Warns on “Head-in-the-Sand” Approach to Cybersecurity

Published

on

[ad_1]

  • “Cyber Security Report 2024/2025” by Horizon3.ai for the United
    Kingdom
  • Cybersecurity expert Keith Poyser: “Half of companies neglect
    regular assessments of their operational cyber risks, despite it being
    essential to protect themselves from potential threats and comply with
    modern legislation.”

At least half of UK organisations are neglecting to assess their
operational cyber risks, despite the increasing threats in the
cybersecurity landscape and the requirements of regulations such as DORA
and NIS2, according to Keith Poyser, Vice President for EMEA at
cybersecurity company Horizon3.ai. He cites findings from Horizon3.ai’s
“Cyber Security Report 2024/2025”, which surveyed 150 UK organisations.
The report reveals that only 23% of the companies regularly conduct risk
assessments of their IT infrastructure to determine how vulnerable they
are to cyberattacks.

Industry veteran Keith Poyser raises a key concern: “Regular assessment
of operational cybersecurity is essential to meet both current and
forthcoming legal requirements for IT security. This includes the Cyber
Security and Resilience Bill, set to be introduced to Parliament this
year, alongside European regulations like the Cyber Resilience Act
(CRA), which also impact UK organisations working with EU partners.
Moreover, ongoing evaluations are the only effective way to mitigate the
potentially severe consequences of cyberattacks. Companies that neglect
to assess their cyber resilience are knowingly putting themselves at
considerable risk.”

Cyber Resilience Requires Regular Maintenance

Nearly a third of organisations acknowledge their weaknesses in this
area, according to the survey. While 31% currently do not conduct cyber
risk assessments, they intend to address this gap in the future.
However, 29% perform assessments only once a year, a quickly out-of-date
snapshot, which is insufficient to stay ahead of evolving threats.

The government’s Cyber security breaches survey 2024* estimates
that UK businesses had experienced approximately 7.78 million cyber
crimes of all types within 12 months. “Limiting penetration testing,
getting a true attacker’s perspective, of your computing and cloud
environments to just once a year borders on negligence,” warns Poyser.
He offers a striking analogy: “It’s like taking your car for an MOT once
every hundred years. It might survive the century, but the odds are far
from being in your favour.”

Head-in-the-Sand Policy on Cybersecurity

According to the study, 13% of companies do not test their defences
against cyberattacks at all—leaving them to be “tested” only by an
actual attack. Furthermore, 11% have no plans to change this approach in
the future. The remaining respondents either saw no need for such
measures, were unable to provide an answer, or stated in the survey: “We
are not aware of any cyber risks.”

Cybersecurity leader Poyser criticises “a widespread
head-in-the-sand-approach to cybersecurity” in many organisations. He
explains: “Businesses install common defensive devices like firewalls,
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Cloud Native Application
Protection Programmes (CNAPPs), and similar defensive security tooling,
then simply rely on them to keep all types of attacks away from their
environments. Penetration tests to assess the effectiveness of these
measures are rarely carried out.” This could explain why 23% of the
organisations surveyed admit they have no idea whether they have
suffered a cyberattack in the past two years.

From Defensive to Proactive: The Key to Cybersecurity Success

The survey reveals a concerning imbalance in cybersecurity strategies
and suggests that the lack of preparedness in cybersecurity may stem
from passive and uncertain approaches to security strategies. 34% of
companies reported that they solely rely on defensive measures without
actively testing their resilience, while 21% at least conduct occasional
offensive exercises. Only 7% regularly engage in structured Red and Blue
Team testing, and 15% recognise the need for offensive security but lack
the know-how to implement it. Meanwhile, 18% delegate these crucial
tasks to external consultants. This reactive mindset leaves many
organisations exposed to potential cyber threats.

This reliance on external expertise extends to risk assessments as well.
Among companies that conduct annual or periodic evaluations, 16% handle
them in-house, while 42% bring in external service providers. A pentest
involves a full-scale simulated cyberattack on a company’s IT
infrastructure to test its resilience against real-world threats. As US
cybersecurity expert Bruce Schneier aptly put it, “You can’t defend. You
can’t prevent. The only thing you can do is detect and respond.”

Cybersecurity expert Poyser confirms: “The UK economy relies far too
heavily on the assumption that defense systems will work when needed,
without systematically verifying their effectiveness. We need to shift
from a defensive to a more proactive offensive approach to tackle
cybersecurity crises.”

* https://ots.de/pTA7ra

About Horizon3.ai and NodeZero: Horizon3.ai provides a
cloud-based platform, NodeZero, enabling organisations and public
authorities to simulate self-attacks on their IT infrastructure to
assess their cyber resilience through penetration testing (pentesting).
Thanks to its cloud model, the platform offers affordable, regular
pentesting, making it accessible to mid-sized companies. Horizon3.ai
continuously monitors the cybercrime landscape to ensure that newly
discovered vulnerabilities are swiftly integrated into the cloud system.
NodeZero not only identifies security flaws but also offers tailored
recommendations for remediation. Through this platform, Horizon3.ai
helps organisations meet rising regulatory demands for cyber resilience
in Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC), with guidelines recommending an
internal self-attack at least once a week.

Trademark notice: NodeZero is a trademark of Horizon3.ai

Further information:
Horizon3.AI Europe GmbH, Sebastian-Kneipp-Str. 41, 60439 Frankfurt am Main, Web: www.horizon3.ai

PR Agency: euromarcom public relations GmbH, Tel. +49 611 973150, Web: www.euromarcom.de, E-Mail: [email protected]

[ad_2]

Source link

Business & Finance

How AI is Transforming Small Businesses: Success Stories

This article explores the transformative impact of AI on small enterprises, highlighting specific case studies of businesses that have successfully integrated AI technologies to enhance efficiency and competitiveness.

Published

on

In September 2026, the Financial Times reported a significant surge in the adoption of AI technologies by small enterprises, driven by the promise of enhanced efficiency and reduced operational costs. Among the many businesses venturing into this digital frontier, a few stand out as exemplary cases, demonstrating the transformative power of AI when strategically implemented.

Take, for instance, GreenLeaf Grocers, a small organic food retailer based in Brighton. Faced with the challenges of scaling operations and managing inventory efficiently, GreenLeaf turned to AI-driven inventory management systems. By analyzing customer purchasing patterns and forecasting demand, the system enabled the grocer to optimize stock levels, reducing waste by 30% within the first year. The owner, Sarah Jenkins, noted, “AI has not only streamlined our operations but has also allowed us to focus more on customer service and community engagement.” This case underscores the potential of AI to reshape retail operations, offering insights into customer behavior that were previously inaccessible.

Another compelling story is that of TechFixers, a family-run electronics repair shop in Manchester. Confronted with increasing competition and the need to differentiate their services, the owners implemented an AI-powered diagnostic tool. This technology rapidly identifies device issues, providing technicians with precise solutions. As a result, TechFixers reduced average repair times by 40%, significantly boosting customer satisfaction and expanding their clientele. The owner, Mark Thompson, attributes their competitive edge to AI, stating, “Integrating AI into our diagnostic process has been a game-changer, allowing us to offer quicker, more reliable repairs.”

In the realm of financial services, FinServe, a small accounting firm in London, illustrates the impact of AI on service delivery. By employing AI-based analytics tools, FinServe offers clients real-time financial insights and predictive forecasting. This capability has attracted a new segment of tech-savvy clients seeking proactive financial management. The firm’s director, Lucy Patel, emphasized the strategic advantage gained, “AI has empowered us to provide a level of service that was previously the domain of larger firms. We’re now able to deliver insights and strategic advice that truly add value for our clients.”

These cases highlight not only the successful application of AI in various industries but also the diverse ways in which small enterprises can leverage technology to overcome specific challenges. While the potential benefits of AI are substantial, the journey is not without its hurdles. Businesses must navigate the complexities of data integration, system compatibility, and the initial investment costs. However, for those willing to embrace the change, the rewards can be substantial.

As AI technology continues to evolve, its role in small business operations is likely to expand, offering new opportunities for innovation and growth. The experiences of GreenLeaf Grocers, TechFixers, and FinServe serve as a testament to the transformative power of AI, providing a roadmap for other small enterprises eager to harness this technology.

Looking ahead, the integration of AI into small business operations is set to become even more pervasive. As technology advances and becomes more accessible, businesses of all sizes will find new ways to leverage AI for competitive advantage, creating a dynamic and constantly evolving landscape.

Continue Reading

Business & Finance

EU Cryptocurrency Regulations: A New Era for Market Transparency and Investor Confidence

The European Union’s new cryptocurrency regulations promise to enhance market transparency and bolster investor confidence, potentially setting a global standard for regulatory practices.

Published

on

In September 2026, the European Union unveiled a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of digital finance. These new regulations are designed to foster market transparency and enhance investor confidence, setting a precedent that could influence global cryptocurrency policies. The framework, announced by the European Commission, aims to address the volatility and unpredictability that have long plagued the cryptocurrency markets. By implementing stringent disclosure requirements and robust consumer protection measures, the EU seeks to create a safer and more stable environment for both seasoned investors and new entrants.

At the heart of the new regulations are provisions that require cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers to adhere to strict transparency standards. This includes mandatory reporting of transaction data and enhanced identity verification processes, which aim to curb illegal activities such as money laundering and fraud. According to the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Mairead McGuinness, these measures will not only protect investors but also bolster the legitimacy of the cryptocurrency market as a whole.

The impact on the market has been immediate and largely positive. Following the announcement, several major cryptocurrencies experienced a surge in value, reflecting increased confidence in the regulated environment. Industry leaders, including Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, have publicly supported the EU’s approach, highlighting its potential to attract institutional investors who have been hesitant to engage with unregulated markets.

Moreover, the EU’s proactive stance on regulation is likely to influence other regions to adopt similar frameworks. As the global financial community grapples with the challenges and opportunities presented by digital currencies, the EU’s model offers a blueprint for balancing innovation with security. Experts suggest that this could lead to a harmonized set of international standards, facilitating cross-border cryptocurrency transactions and fostering global economic integration.

Critics, however, caution against over-regulation stifling innovation within the cryptocurrency space. Yet, proponents argue that a well-regulated market can actually spur technological advancement by providing clear guidelines within which innovation can thrive. By demystifying the legal landscape, the EU’s regulations could encourage more startups to develop blockchain-based solutions under a stable and predictable legal framework.

Looking ahead, the EU’s regulatory framework is poised to redefine the cryptocurrency landscape, with potential ripple effects across the globe. As other jurisdictions observe the EU’s progress, they may be inspired to implement similar measures, ultimately contributing to a more transparent and secure global financial system. In this new era, the balance between regulation and innovation will be key to unlocking the full potential of cryptocurrencies.

Continue Reading

Business & Finance

EU’s Regulatory Shift: A Boon for Small Tech Firms

New EU regulations targeting tech monopolies promise to level the playing field, offering unprecedented opportunities for smaller tech companies to thrive. Explore how these changes could reshape the industry.

Published

on

In a decisive move aimed at curbing the dominance of technology giants, the European Union has implemented a suite of new regulations designed to foster competition and innovation within the industry. Announced by the European Commission on May 21, 2026, these measures are part of a broader strategy to dismantle monopolistic practices and empower smaller players in the tech sector. The Financial Times reported that this regulatory shift could herald a new era for startups and small businesses, offering them a unique opportunity to compete on a more level playing field.

For years, the EU has tussled with tech behemoths over issues ranging from data privacy to market monopolies. These latest regulations, however, mark a significant escalation in the EU’s efforts to promote fair competition. By targeting the monopolistic practices that have long stifled smaller competitors, the EU aims to dismantle barriers that have historically protected the interests of large corporations. This shift is timely, as innovation increasingly emerges from smaller tech companies that often lack the resources to challenge established giants.

The current regulatory framework introduces stringent measures that impose limits on data sharing, promote transparency in algorithms, and mandate interoperability between platforms. These measures, as detailed by the European Commission, aim to dismantle the walls that have allowed tech giants to corner markets and stifle competition. Smaller firms, often more agile and innovative, stand to benefit immensely. By ensuring that platforms cannot unfairly prioritize their own services, these regulations open doors for startups to enter markets previously dominated by a few large players.

Market analysts have noted that these changes could lead to a renaissance in tech innovation across Europe. Smaller companies, unburdened by the constraints of battling entrenched incumbents, are likely to experiment with new technologies and business models. For instance, the requirement for interoperability could lead to the development of new collaborative platforms that challenge existing ecosystems. As a result, consumers may see a surge in diverse product offerings tailored to specific needs, driven by smaller companies eager to carve out niche markets.

The response from tech giants has been predictably cautious. While some have expressed willingness to comply, others have raised concerns about the potential for stifling innovation and increasing operational costs. However, proponents of the regulations argue that true innovation thrives in competitive environments. By breaking the hold of tech monopolies, the EU is not only fostering a fairer market but also driving the industry towards a more dynamic and responsive future.

Looking ahead, these regulatory changes could catalyze a shift in the global tech landscape. As smaller companies gain traction and challenge the status quo, the ripple effects may extend beyond Europe, influencing regulatory approaches worldwide. This development promises to reshape the dynamics of the tech industry, offering a glimpse of a future where innovation is driven by diversity and competition, rather than the dominance of a select few.

Continue Reading

Trending